On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > With the latest HASH WAL patch applied, I get different but apparently > related errors > > 41993 UPDATE XX002 2016-12-05 22:28:45.333 PST:ERROR: index "foo_index_idx" > contains corrupted page at block 27602 > 41993 UPDATE XX002 2016-12-05 22:28:45.333 PST:HINT: Please REINDEX it. > 41993 UPDATE XX002 2016-12-05 22:28:45.333 PST:STATEMENT: update foo set > count=count+1 where index=$1 >
This is not the problem of WAL patch per se. It should be fixed with the hash index bug fix patch I sent upthread. However, after the bug fix patch, WAL patch needs to be rebased which I will do and send it after verification. In the meantime, it would be great if you can verify the fix posted. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
