On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Unless we want to wait until that work is committed before doing more review
>> and testing on this.
>>
>
> The concurrent hash index patch is getting changed and some of the
> changes needs change in this patch as well.  So, I think after it gets
> somewhat stabilized, I will update this patch as well.
>

Now that concurrent hash index patch is committed [1], I will work on
rebasing this patch.  Note, I have moved this to next CF.


[1] - 
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=6d46f4783efe457f74816a75173eb23ed8930020

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to