On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: ...
> Con: "JSON path expression" is a recurring them in the *grammars* of >> user-facing operators in [1], [2], [3], and [4]. But it doesn't >> necessarily follow that the function implemented in Step 2 will provide >> useful infrastructure for PG's eventual implementations of "JSON_TABLE", >> etc. >> > > We can implement subset only - our XPath based on libxml2 does it too. The > good target is support of usual examples on the net. > Hi Pavel, Can you clarify what you meant? I *think* you're saying: * It's not important for me to match the syntax/semantics of the json-path implementations found in MySQL / Oracle / DB2 / MS SQL Server, and * Instead, I should just use examples / explanations on the web as my guidance. Thanks, Christian
