On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:23:28PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > I agree up to a point. I think we need to design our own system as > well as we can, not just copy what others have done. For example, the > design I sketched will work with all of PostgreSQL's existing index > types. You need to modify each AM in order to support in-place > updates when a column indexed by that AM has been modified, and that's > probably highly desirable, but it's not a hard requirement.
I feel you are going to get into the problem of finding the index entry for the old row --- the same thing that is holding back more aggressive WARM updates. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
