On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes: > > In 9.4, I encountered a complaint about flex 2.6.0. After a little > research > > it seems that a fix for that made it into versions 9.3+, but not 9.4. > > Er ... what? See 1ba874505. > > regards, tom lane > Maybe git fetch might didn't pick up that change. Odd that it did pick it up on all other REL_* branches. Feel free to disregard that file. I re-ran git pulls from my committed local branches to the corresponding REL9_x_STABLE branch, and encountered no conflicts, so the 0001.dblink.* patches should still be good.
