Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 11/14/16 4:38 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > >> The patch 02_close_listen... closes the listen sockets > >> explicitly when it's known that postmaster is going to stop all the > >> children and then die. I have tried to see, if there's a possibility > >> that it closes the listen sockets but do not actually die, thus > >> causing a server which doesn't accept any connections and doesn't die. > >> But I have not found that possibility. > > > I can see the point of this, but I'm not sure whether this is always a > > good idea. > > IMO it's not, and closer analysis says that this patch series is an > attempt to solve something we already fixed, better, in 9.4.
... by the same patch submitter. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers