* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 10 November 2016 at 17:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Yeah, I think we'd be best off to avoid the bare term "security". > > It's probably too late to change the RTE field name "securityQuals", > > but maybe we could uniformly call those "security barrier quals" in > > the comments. Then the basic terminology is that we have security > > barrier views and row-level security both implemented on top of > > security barrier quals, and we should be careful to use the right > > one of those three terms in comments/documentation. > > +1 for that terminology and no renaming of fields.
Agreed. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
