On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > + * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2015, PostgreSQL Global Development Group > + * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California > > Shouldn't this say just "(c) 2016, PostgreSQL Global Development > Group"? Are we supposed to be blaming the University of California > for new files?
If the new file contains a portion of code from this age, yes. If that's something completely new using only PGDG is fine. At least that's what I can conclude by looking at git log -p and search for "new file mode". -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
