On 2016/10/26 17:57, Amit Kapila wrote:
> @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ typedef struct RelationData
> {
> ..
> MemoryContext rd_partkeycxt; /* private memory cxt for the below */
> struct PartitionKeyData *rd_partkey; /* partition key, or NULL */
> + MemoryContext rd_pdcxt; /* private context for partdesc */
> + struct PartitionDescData *rd_partdesc; /* partitions, or NULL */
> + List *rd_partcheck; /* partition CHECK quals */
> ..
> }
>
> I think one thing to consider here is the increase in size of relcache
> due to PartitionDescData. I think it will be quite useful in some of
> the cases like tuple routing. Isn't it feasible to get it in some
> other way, may be by using relpartbound from pg_class tuple?
Whereas pg_class.relpartbound stores partition bound of the *individual
partitions* in Node form, the above relcache struct is associated with
parent tables; it contains some efficient to use (and fairly compact)
representation of bounds of *all* the partitions of the parent. Consider
for example, an array of sorted range bounds for range partitioned tables.
Thanks,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
