On October 22, 2016 11:59:15 AM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Uh, sorry. My proposal a couple of years back was to put the >> relfilenode, not the name. I didn't notice that it was the name >being >> proposed here. However, now I notice that this idea doesn't solve >the >> problem for mapped relations. > >Well, as long as a catalog lookup would be required anyway, what about >putting in the table OID?
How about storing two table names? The old and what the relation is being renamed to? We wouldn't be able to tell after a crash which is which, but that'll usually still be helpful. Every rename would clear out the old/wrong one, and add the target filename. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
