Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> dromedary seems to have found one, or at least an unstable test result.
> OK, looking at that now. Thanks.
Looking at further failures, it looks like 32-bit machines in general
get that result. Might be just a cost estimation difference.
Also, some of the windows machines are folding "sqrt(2)" to a different
constant than is hard-wired into the expected-result file. That's
slightly annoying because it calls into question whether we can ship
floating-point computations to the far end at all :-(.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
