On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:29:24 +0900 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's invasive. I am wondering if a cleaner approach here would be a > flag in deleteOneObject() that performs the lock cleanup, as that's > what you are trying to solve here. The problem occurs earlier, at the findDependentObjects step. All the objects inside the namespace are being locked before any of them gets deleted, which leads to the "too many locks" condition. Cheers, Constantin Pan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
