Tom,

* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes:
> > A customer just pinged me wondering how it was that a BitmapAnd node was 
> > reporting 0 tuples when the Bitmap Heap Scan above it showed it had in 
> > fact generated tuples.
> 
> > While this is mentioned in the docs, I think it would be very helpful to 
> > have ANALYZE spit out "N/A" instead of 0 for these nodes.
> 
> That would break code that tries to parse that stuff, eg depesz.com.

I don't believe Jim was suggesting that we back-patch such a change.

Changing it in a new major release seems entirely reasonable.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to