On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:39, Eric D Nielsen wrote: > > Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I haven't had time to look into it further, but it occurs to me that > > > handling views which rely on joins would be far from trivial. > > > > Views containing joins would not be updatable; problem solved. > > I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that > people use/want to update a join of some type? I thought that SQL99 allowed > updating view created by joins. > > In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good > thing or a bad thing?
Lets try to meet the spec first, then debate about whether extending it is a good or bad thing :) -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
