On 3 October 2016 at 10:10, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 6 September 2016 at 16:10, Daniel Verite <dan...@manitou-mail.org> wrote: >>> Craig Ringer wrote: >>> >>>> Updated patch attached. >>> >>> Please find attached a couple fixes for typos I've came across in >>> the doc part. >> >> Thanks, will apply and post a rebased patch soon, or if someone picks >> this up in the mean time they can apply your diff on top of the patch. > > Could you send an updated patch then? At the same time I am noticing > that git --check is complaining... This patch has tests and a > well-documented feature, so I'll take a look at it soon at the top of > my list. Moved to next CF for now.
Thanks. I'd really like to teach psql in non-interactive mode to use it, but (a) I'm concerned about possible subtle behaviour differences arising if we do that and (b) I won't have the time. I think it's mostly of interest to app authors and driver developers and that's what it's aimed at. pg_restore could benefit a lot too. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
