Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes:
> On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+
>> altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output
>> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
>> out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking
>> anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
>>
>> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
>> footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing.
> I agree with everything Alvaro just said.
Well, alternatively, can we get a consensus for doing that? People
did speak against removing PL source code from \df+ altogether, but
maybe they're willing to reconsider if the alternative is doing nothing.
Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
