On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lat...@gmail.com> writes: > > I agree with the argument in this thread, having "Source code" as part > > of \df+ is bit annoying, specifically when output involve some really > > big PL language functions. Having is separate does make \df+ output more > > readable. So I would vote for \df++ rather then adding the source code > > as part of footer for \df+. > > If it's unreadable in \df+, how would \df++ make that any better? > > Eventhough source code as part of \df+ is bit annoying (specifically for PL functions), I noticed the argument in this thread that it's useful information for some of. So \df++ is just alternate option for the those who want the source code. > regards, tom lane > -- Rushabh Lathia
