On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder why you have included a new file for these tests, why can't be these added to existing hash_index.sql. tests in hash_index.sql did not cover overflow pages, above tests were for mainly for them. So I thought having a separate test file can help enabling/disabling them in schedule files, when we do not want them running as it take slightly high time. If you think otherwise I will reconsider will add tests to hash_index.sql.
>The relation name con_hash_index* choosen in above tests doesn't seem to be appropriate, how about hash_split_heap* or something like that. Fixed. Have renamed relation, index and test filename accordingly. -- Thanks and Regards Mithun C Y EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
commit-hash_coverage_test_v2_no_wal.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
