On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > Wow, this is really cool. We should do something like this for query > execution too.
We should certainly do this for tuplestore.c, too. I've been meaning to adopt it to use batch memory. I did look at it briefly, and recall that it was surprisingly awkward because a surprisingly large number of callers want to have memory that they can manage independently of the lifetime of their tuplestore. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
