On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 08:26:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes: > > I was tempted to back-patch this. The risk to back branch users seems > > negligible, and it would be convenient for me as a person who builds all > > branches. That reason is not good enough, so I plan not to back-patch. I > > feel like I might be missing a stronger reason to back-patch. > > Hm, wouldn't it help reduce the cycle time for Windows buildfarm members? > That might still not be adequate reason, but it's an advantage beyond > time-saving for individual developers.
Yes; multi-core Windows buildfarm members could configure MSBFLAGS=/m to finish more quickly. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
