Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hmm, comparing gin_desc() to ginRedoInsert() makes me think there are more
>> problems there than that one. Aren't the references to "payload" wrong
>> in all three branches of that "if" construct, not just the middle one?
> If we do this, the extra information like ginxlogInsertEntry->isDelete will
> never be reported when the record has FPW.
I'm happy to have it print whatever is there, but are you sure that the
information is even there? I thought that this chunk of the WAL record
would get optimized away if we write an FPW image instead.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
