On 8/26/16 12:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Also, I'd just as soon not move/rename things > that don't really need it.
I'm just as happy with not changing anything. But if we're going to rename stuff, let's at least think about something slightly more comprehensive. Any rename is going to break a bunch of stuff. But if we break it in a way that reduces the need for future discussion or changes, it would at least be a small win in the long run. > If, for example, we decide to move > postgresql.conf to etc/postgresql.conf, that is going to break a metric > ton of stuff that doesn't need to get broken AFAICS. Sure, I'd be content with leaving those in the top-level instead of say "etc". -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
