On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:40:06PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote: > > time instead of requiring a recompile; we probably don't save any > > significant number of cycles by compiling this into the server. > > FWIW, +1 > > We're already hurt by the small segments due to a similar phenomenon > as the ssh case: TCP slow start. Designing the archive/recovery > command to work around TCP slow start is quite complex, and bigger > segments would just be a better thing. > > Not to mention that bigger segments compress better.
This would be good time to rename pg_xlog and pg_clog directories too. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers