Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:42:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> The mechanism I described in the above-referenced message only occurs >> for nailed-in-cache system tables. Given Daniels' report (and one or
> And for ones that have been truncated? I found this reference: > ><http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=200301251026.14193.mallah%40trade-india.com&rnum=5&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DUninitialized%2Bpage%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.*%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D200301251026.14193.mallah%2540trade-india.com%26rnum%3D5> Sigh, I must be losing brain cells faster than I thought. I completely forgot about the TRUNCATE version of the problem. Of course, if the complainant hasn't done TRUNCATE either, then we may still have an issue ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
