On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote: > I don't think it's any great leap for someone to think they can use those > commands incrementally. It's certainly one of the first things you think of > when using rsync. AFAIK there's no downside at all to using -c when it is a > brand new copy, so I'm thinking we should just put it in there, especially > considering what the potential downside is.
I think that's right. The suggestion that people might use some backup tool is a good one, but that's not a reason not to add -c here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
