On 8/18/16 5:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I agree, but I think mandating a database name (which I suppose could be
> *) with the specifiers would solve that issue.
Hmm, something like "-T dbname1:pattern1 -T dbname2:pattern2" ?
Bingo. Hopefully there'd be some way to consolidate the code between the
two as well...
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
