Emre Hasegeli <e...@hasegeli.com> writes:
>> I did *not* push the hunk in citext.sgml, since that was alleging support
>> that doesn't actually exist in this patch.  To make this work for citext,
>> we need to add wrapper functions similar to citext's wrappers for
>> regexp_matches.  And that in turn means a citext extension version bump,
>> which makes it more notationally tedious than I felt like dealing with
>> today.  I'm bouncing that requirement back to you to produce a separate
>> patch for.

> It is attached.

You missed updating citext_1.out, but otherwise looks good.  Pushed.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to