Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
>> back further?
> I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
> back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN. I don't
> think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.
I agree with fixing 9.6, but not further back.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
