Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> It looks to me like the reason for it is simply not having bothered to > >> copy the rw->rw_worker data to somewhere that would survive deletion > >> of the PostmasterContext. I wonder though if anyone remembers a more > >> fundamental reason? Surely the bgworker is not supposed to touch any > >> of the rest of the BackgroundWorkerList? > > > I just checked BDR, which is the more complex code using workers I know > > of, and I don't see any reason why this cannot be changed. > > The attached patch passes "make check-world" for me. Can you check it > against BDR?
Just checked. It works fine. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
