On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Over the past couple of months I have already found myself > writing "10.0" or "9.7^H^H^H10" to make it clear that I meant the next > release version, because just "10" seemed too ambiguous.
I thought that was just (and maybe some instances were) humor regarding the general indecisiveness on the issue. > Maybe I'm > worried about nothing and the ambiguity mostly came from our not having > settled the two-or-three-part-version-number question, but I'm not sure. > I think this dynamic will sort itself out. I suspect I'll end up using 10.x somewhat frequently though I'm mostly on the lists. I suspect the choice will be dependent on context and channel. David J.
