Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Andrew Borodin <boro...@octonica.com> wrote:
>> I've attached patch with a bump, but, obviously, it'll be irrelevant
>> after any other commit changing WAL shape.
> Usually the committer in charge of reviewing such a patch would bump
> it. There is no need for the patch submitter to do so. I should have
> been more precise previously, sorry for my twisted words.
It's good to remind the committer that such a bump is needed, of course.
But yeah, casting the reminder in the form of a hunk of the patch is
more likely to cause trouble than be helpful.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
