On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> >> I do not think changing this is appropriate. All you are likely to >> accomplish is breaking code that does what its author wanted. >> > > Hmmm... My 0.02€: Currently this feature is NOT documented, so somehow it > is not supported, and relying on it seems risky, as it is really a side > effect of the current implementation. If it becomes documented, it could be > made to behave sanely at the same time... To me it has sane and well-defined behavior - if maybe rarely useful. Why would you choose to execute "SELECT 1 \; SELECT 2;" instead of "SELECT 1; SELECT 2;" in a setup where the behavior of both strings is identical? Or, rather, how would they differ? David J.
