Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 3. In https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25521.1465837...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> Tom proposed adding a GUC to set the minimum relation size required
>> for consideration of parallelism.
> I have posted a patch for this upthread [3]. The main thing to verify is
> the default value of guc.
I'll review and push this patch, unless Robert or somebody else has
already started on it. I concur with your choice of setting the default
value to 1024 blocks; that's close to the existing behavior but as a power
of 2 will look cleaner in GUC size units.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
