On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, I pushed this after re-reviewing it and fixing a number of > oversights. There remains only the task of adding max_parallel_degree > as a system-wide limit (as opposed to max_parallel_degree now > max_parallel_workers_per_gather which is a per-Gather limit), which > I'm going to argue should be a new open item and not necessarily one > that I have to own myself. I would like to take care of it, but I > will not put it ahead of fixing actual defects and I will not promise > to have it done in time for 9.6.
I am in favor of having something similar to max_parallel_workers_per_gather for utility statements like CREATE INDEX. That will need a cost model, at least where the DBA isn't explicit about the number of workers to use. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
