On 05/31/2016 06:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that, your original approach of manually updating proargtypes in the existing pg_proc row for the functions may be the best way. Anything else is going to be more complicated and ultimately will still require at least one direct catalog update.
It is the least ugly of all the ugly solutions I could think of. I have attached a patch which fixes the signatures using this method. I use CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION to update to catcache. What do you think? Is it too ugly?
Andreas
gin-gist-signatures-v1.patch.gz
Description: application/gzip
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
