On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Does it appear to compile without that?
It does. The only thing that's absent is the pgrminclude directive, which is of course just a C comment. > (More generally, is there a better answer for that problem?) My unpublished parallel B-Tree index build patch will move everything to do with index builds into nbtsort.c. So, I will more than likely eventually propose that everything in question live there. I think that's a better approach in general, because the current high-level coordination from nbtree.c (e.g. how spools are initialized there) seems a little contrived. A single entry point for nbtsort.c works better. Short term, I guess the best solution is to just have a pgrminclude directive in both files. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
