On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It seems unlikely to me that recursing into the name lists is helpful > here: those are not going to contain any data that is interpretable > without context. Did you have a reason to do that?
I saw no reason to avoid the extra cycles. A noticeable omission has a cost: it gets noticed. Given this code path is likely to hardly ever be hit, this mechanical approach seemed best. That's all. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
