> On May 19, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Евгений Шишкин <itparan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 20 May 2016, at 01:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> >> I'm a bit inclined to think that what this is really about is that we >> made the wrong call on the BUFFERS option, and that it should default >> to ON just like COSTS and TIMING do. Yeah, that would be an incompatible >> change, but that's what major releases are for no? > > After thinking about it, i think this is a better idea.
Yeah, if that’s the only practical difference, WORKSFORME; I can see the point about boxing us into a corner at some future time. +1. -- David Christensen End Point Corporation da...@endpoint.com 785-727-1171 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
