On May 13, 2016 23:27, "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > On 05/13/2016 02:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> > >> Using something like <year>.2.0 for the second one in the same year >> could be suggested, but to me that sounds like the worst of both worlds. > > > The amount of brain cycles, electricity, taxes on internet connectivity and transcontinental data spent on the discussion of version numbers could have finished the release by now. > > How about we just call it 9.6? >
I'm pretty sure most people aren't talking about this one anymore, it's about the next one. I certainly am. 9.6 was pretty much decided when we put out the beta, tbh. /Magnus
