On 13 May 2016 at 16:29, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> >> Well, one potential issues is that there may be projects which have >> already coded in 9.6 checks for feature support. > > I suspect that won't be an issue (I never heard of it being for 7.5, > which was released as 8.0 - but is smattered all over pgAdmin 3 for > example) - largely because in such apps we're almost always checking > for a version greater than or less than x.y. > > I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written > assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit.
Is that likely? That would be remarkably myopic, but I guess possible. Thom -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
