On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:58:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > I think we'd be better off to rename these to tsvector_delete() > > and tsvector_filter() while we still can. > > ... although I now notice that hstore already exposes a function > named delete(), so that ship may have sailed already. But I'm more > troubled by filter() anyhow, since that keyword can appear in > expressions --- it seems much more likely that that would pose a > parsing conflict after future SQL extensions.
I suspect that steering that ship would be a good idea starting with deprecation of the old name in 9.6, etc. hs_filter(), perhaps? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
