On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: [DJC: This feels rather fragile. I doubt that it is hardware related because I dad [DJC: tried it on the other ethernet interface in the machine which was on a [DJC: completely different network than the one I am on now.
All I can offer up is that at one point I had to reduce to 16k NFSIO when I replaced a switch (you didn't replace a switch, did you?) between my i386 and my sparc (my le0 and the switch didn't play nicely together; once I got the hme0 in, everything was happy as a clam). [DJC: What is the implication of smaller read and write size? Will I [DJC: necessarily take a performance hit? I didn't start noticing observable degradation across 100TX until I dropped NFSIO to 4k (which I did purely for benchmarking statistics). The differences between 8k, 16k and 32k have not been noticeable to me. 32k IO would hang my system at one point; since that time, something appears to have been fixed. [DJC: -- [DJC: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves [DJC: http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on [DJC: +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. [DJC: --*greywolf; -- NetBSD: Servers' choice! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]