On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Amit Langote wrote: >>> I think it'd be better to match the comment with that for >>> create_foreignscan_path(). So how about "ForeignPath represents a >>> potential scan of a foreign table, foreign join, or foreign upper-relation >>> processing"? I think we would probably need to update the comment in >>> src/backend/optimizer/README (L358), too. >> >> That's a lot better. Updated patch attached. > > Looks OK to me, too. Committed.
Thanks! - Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
