Jeff (Reviving an old thread for 2014...)
* Jeff Davis (pg...@j-davis.com) wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 23:43 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 01:21 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > > > On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 21:11 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:50 +0100, Nicholas White wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the detailed feedback, I'm sorry it took so long to > > > > > incorporate it. I've attached the latest version of the patch, fixing > > > > > in particular: > > > > As innocent as this patch seemed at first, it actually opens up a lot of > > questions. > > > > Attached is the (incomplete) edit of the patch so far. > > I haven't received much feedback so far on my changes, and I don't think > I will finish hacking on this in the next few days, so I will mark it > "returned with feedback". > > I don't think it's too far away, but my changes are substantial enough > (and incomplete enough) that some feedback is required. Would you have time to work on this for 9.7..? I came across a real-world use case for exactly this capability and was sorely disappointed to discover we didn't support it even though there had been discussion for years on it, which quite a few interested parties. I'll take a look at reviewing your last version of the patch but wanted to get an idea of if you still had interest and might be able to help. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
