On 04/14/2016 08:57 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 14 April 2016 at 16:52, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de <mailto:and...@anarazel.de>> wrote:> If we aren't going to talk about changes in advance, then multiple > commit rights is a recipe for conflict, not a better way at all. Obviously we should discuss design bits, I don't see how that's a conflict. If everything is going to be discussed here, that's great, no conflict. I've got lots of changes I would personally like to make, but we need to get something in first before we start doing more.
I don't agree with that at all. At least from what I am reading, a lot of what Andres is talking about would work just fine as a separate extension project.
Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
