On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> If you want me to rn some other tests I can, but ISTM we have the > data we need? Thanks for the additional detail on how this was run. I think I still need a little more context, though: What is the kernel on which these tests were run? Which pg commit were these tests run against? If 2201d801 was not included in your -1 tests, have you identified where the 2% extra run time is going on -1 versus reverted? Since several other threads lately have reported bigger variation than that based on random memory alignment issues, can we confirm that this is a real difference in what is at master's HEAD? Of course, I'm still scheduled to test on bare metal machines in a couple days, on two different architectures, so we'll have a few more data points after that. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
