Hannu Krosing wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 20:29, Tom Lane wrote: > > Claiming that it doesn't require an increased level of testing is > > somewhere between ridiculous and irresponsible. > > We should have at least _some_ platforms (besides Win32) that we could > clain to have run thorough test on. > > I suspect that RedHat does some (perhaps even severe) testing for > RHAS/RHDB, but I don't know of any other thorough testing. > > Or should reliability testing actually be something left for commercial > entities ?
The testing has to be done before we make anything available as an official release. As of now, the status of this project is at the beginning of incorporating a 7.2.1 based patch into CVS HEAD. Asking for exzessive tests at this stage of development and (ab)using the absence of 100% proof of rock solid reliability as an excuse to reject the entire aproach would be ridiculous. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] # ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
