On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Here is a version that includes an attempt to describe the > situation in the documentation. Pushed with minor adjustments to the docs. Mostly I thought your new text was more appropriate as just another paragraph than as a "note". The previous paragraph was a little imprecise and was in some conflict with the new one, so I adjusted that a little, too. Nice work! I sure wish we had spotted that a one-line check there would have covered so much when the feature was first added. I understand there is considerable feeling that this should be back-patched, but I have not done that pending a clear consensus on the point, since it is a user-visible behavioral change. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
