On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, HOT-cleanup should stop the bloat increase once the snapshot > crosses the old_snapshot_threshold without even needing to wait until > the next autovac runs. > > Does the code intentionally only work for manual vacuums? If so, that > seems quite surprising. Or perhaps I am missing something else here.
What proportion of the statements in your simulated workload were updates? Per my last mail to this thread, I'm interested in knowing if this was a delete heavy workload. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
