Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm not Jim, but I have a question: what's the motivation for the
>> Fortran-order traversal of the result (down rows before across columns)?
> If I am understanding you correctly, it does work the way you find
> intuitive: all results from the first row are executed before any in the
> second row, so
Oh, I hadn't checked the code closely enough to realize that, but I see
you're right. The patch's documentation seems very confusing on the
point, though:
+ The secondary queries are executed in top-to-bottom, left-to-right
order, so the command
I took that as meaning what I said above.
>> It should clear that in all the same
>> places where gfname or gset_prefix get cleared.
> I'm only seeing one place where those two vars are deallocated and nulled,
> and that's at the tail end of SendQuery. Were you expecting more than just
> that?
That may be the only place; I've not looked around.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
